学位论文题名  法律全球化及其对当代中国法治进程之影响
论文作者      张龙
作者单位      吉林大学
专    业      法学理论
指导教师      张文显
并列题名      Globalization of law and its influence on contemporary course of rule of law in China
学位级别      303
中文文摘 近些年来全球化浪潮风靡世界，法律全球化问题亦被相应提出。法律能否全球化？它是怎样实现全球化的？法律全球化将把我们引向何方？它对中国法律发展造成了怎样的影响？这些都是中国法学界，尤其是法理学界的学者们必须正视的难题。然而，我们对于上述问题的研究却不够深入和系统，对于法律全球化仍时常语焉不详。正是在上述问题意识的引导下，本文试图对法律全球化进行比较全面、深入和系统的思考。全文采用了上、中、下三篇的体例。上篇包括四部分，对全球化进行了解析；中篇包括三部分，对法律全球化进行了解析；下篇由四部分构成，研究了法律全球化对当代中国法治进程的影响。上篇第一部分，全球化释义，即通过各种考察对全球化作出界定。首先对全球化追本溯源，指明“全球化”一词的本源意义在跨民族、跨国家和跨区域性；其次，剖析已有的全球化定义，指明其观察维度的欠缺等缺憾；尔后在肯定赫尔德等人的定义的同时，提出作者的全球化释义：全球 化指人类社会的活动跨越民族、国家、区域及大陆等时空界限，彼此联系更为紧密、相互影响更为显著的网络化的复合进程，该过程可从网络化的广度、强度、速度以及影响力四个维度加以衡量。上篇第二部分，全球化时段。该部分认为全球化定义差异较大的一个重要原因在于历史分期主张不同。在批判了两种三阶段的全球化划分方法后，笔者对赫尔德等人的四阶段划分法进行了修正：第一阶段，前现代的全球化，从世界四大古代文明的产生至公元1500年；第二阶段，现代早期的全球化，大约从1500-1850年；第三阶段，现代的全球化，大约从1850-1945年；第四阶段，当代的全球化，从1945年至今。上篇第三部分，全球化特征。该部分纵览了几千年来全球化的共同特征：全球化是一组动态的过程；全球化是一个充满矛盾的过程；全球化几乎囊括了所有的社会领域；全球化是不断跨越原有界限，建构新的全球秩序的复合网络化进程；全球化是复合网络的各种程度不断增强的过程。上篇第四部分，全球化的当代特征。具体包括：全球网络化程度空前；全球性权力关系的制度化、组织化程度空前；全球化形式更加多样，并且重点在逐渐转移；全球化进程中的精英性减弱，大众性加强；全球化中的非西方中心色彩增强；全球化导致政府职能及管理方式的转变。中篇第一部分，法律全球化释义。在批判了法律全球化即法律的世界化、西方化、商事化、国际化、趋同化五种典型的观点后，笔者提出：法律全球化就是在法律的各个领域内发生的跨国界、跨区域、跨大陆的相互作用与影响和重组原有的法律制度、法律秩序和法律理念结构的复合网络化进程。法律全球化又可具体分为四个时期：即各自为政期、异军突起期、混乱动荡期和多元互动期。中篇第二部分，法律全球化特征。具体包括：法律全球化是发生在法律领域内的动态过程；它几乎囊括了所有的法律领域；它是在法律领域内发生的充满矛盾的过程；它是不断跨越原有法律效力边界的复合网络化过程。中篇第三部分，法律全球化的当代特征。具体包括：法律全球化的网络化程度空前提高；法律全球化的制度化、组织化程度空前；它使法律的国家主权色彩减弱；它使法律的调控领域不断扩大和深入；法律全球化中向法治社会趋同的倾向日益明显。下篇第一部分，法律全球化对当代中国法治进程施加影响的阶段。具体包括：建国初期深受苏联法制模式影响的时期；1957年至文革结束时期；1978年后深受西方法治模式影响的时期；加入WTO后法治全面发展时期。下篇第二部分，法律全球化对当代中国法律制度之影响。具体从宪法、行政法、刑法、民法、经济类法律、国际立法与WTO法规六大类法律展开了分析。下篇第三部分，法律全球化对当代中国法学教育之影响。从生源、教师、课程设置、授课方式、培养方向五个大的方面进行了分析。下篇第四部分，法律全球化对当代中国法律共同体的影响。这部分从法律共同体的四种构成要素的发展加以分析，即对法律知识背景、法律职业经历、法律职业利益、法律职业精神气质加以讨论。下篇第五部分，法律全球化对当代中国法律思维及理念的影响。这部分对新中国法律发展的四个阶段加以论述：第一阶段从1949年至1957年，中国法律的苏联化时期；第二阶段从1957年至1978年，片面强调法律的专政功能及彻底的法律虚无主义时期；第三阶段1978年至2001年入世，这是中国向西方法治国家学习与发展的时期；第四阶段从入世算起，这是中国法律理念及思维深入发展时期。最后，笔者指出，历史远未终结，因为它刚刚开始。
英文文摘 interpretation on globalization of law. It is divided into there parts, with four sections in Part One defining and analyzing the globalization, three sections in Part Two defining and analyzing the globalization of law, and five sections in Part Three dealing with the research on the influence of globalization of law on the legal development of China.The first section in Part One is the definition of globalization, which defines the globalization through a series of investigations and studies. Firstly it traces the origin of globalization, pointing out that the original meaning word globalization lies in its features of trans-nationality, trans-nation, and trans-region. Secondly, it analyzes the current definition of globalization, pointing out the shortcomings in terms of the observing dimensionality. On the other hand, at the same time it affirms the definition of Held and others, it puts forward the author''s definition of globalization, that is, globalization is a net-like comprehensive process, which makes it possible for the social activities of human beings to go beyond the boundaries, such as nationalities, nations, and the spatial boundaries of regions and continents, bringing about closer relations and more active interactions between different parts. This process can be measured by the four standards of the scope, tension, speed, and influence of the network.The second section in Part One concerns the time period of globalization. This section points out a major reason that the definition of globalization varies a lot is that people''s opinions change in different time period. After criticizing two three-period methods, the writer revise the views of Held and his followers. The four periods are, pre-modem globalization from the birth of the four ancient civilized countries to 1500,BC, early stage of mordern globalization from 1500 to 1850, the modem globalization from about 1850 to 1945, and the contemporary globalization from 1945 to the present.The third section in Part One focuses on the characteristics of globalization. It surveys the common features of globalization with a history of several thousands years. Globalization is a dynamic process full of conflicts, a process covering almost all the fields in society, a comprehensive network process exceeding the original boundaries again and again and constructing new global orders, and a process with growing forces in all dimensions.The Current Features of Globalization is made up by the following points; the network of globalization is highly developed; the system and organization of power relations is highly developed; the system and organization of power relations is highly enveloped; globalization is in various forms and the focus changes gradually; the elitism is weakened and the it has more touch of common people; the non-western qualities are strengthened; it leads to the transformation of the government functions and ways of management.The first section in Part Two is the definition of globalization of law. Criticizing the opinions that globalization of law is equal to legal universality, westernization, commercialization, internationalization, or transcension, the author points out that globalization of law is a comprehensive network process of the legal system, legal order, and legal thoughts structure interacting an influencing one another trans-national, trans-regional, and trans-continental in legal fields. It can be divided into four specific periods: and the period of plural interaction.Next section concerns the characteristics of globalization of law. It includes the following points: globalization of law is a dynamic process in the field of law; it covers almost all the fields in law; it is a process with conflicts; it is a comprehensive network process exceeding the original boundaries.The Current Features of globalization of law concerns the following: the network degree of globalization of law is greatly enhanced; the system and organization of globalization of law is highly developed; the color of sovereignty of law is desalted; the supervising controlling areas of law is expanded and deepened; the tendency of transcending the rule-of-law society is becoming more and more obvious.
索书号 3020097
主题词 全球化法治法律全球化
分类号 DF0
论文答辩日期 2002061020020520
论文页码总数 57P
论文页码总数 ref21
文献语种 zh
记录来源 吉林大学
记录流水号 DA200212001964

馆藏信息： 馆藏号 索书号
吉林大学 3020097