题　名  论醉酒人犯罪的刑事责任  
作　者  徐加林  
作者单位  吉林大学,法学院,长春市 130012  
专　业  刑法学  
指导教师  吴振兴  
学位级别  303  
馆藏索取号  3990090  
中文文摘  我国刑法对醉酒人犯罪的刑事责任问题规定的过于笼统，加之现实生活中的醉酒情况极为复杂，特别是随着现代医学和司法精神病学研究的深入，对醉酒人犯罪的刑事责任问题的研究已成为重要课题。本文试就醉酒的概念及类型、醉酒人的刑事责任能力、醉酒人犯罪应负刑事责任的量论根据,病理性醉酒人犯罪的刑事责任、醉酒人犯罪的主观罪过形式、醉酒犯罪的刑事责任减免以及承担刑事责任方式等七个方面进行探讨，旨在充实关于醉酒人犯罪的刑事责任问题理论体系。
全文共分以下七个部分。
一、醉酒的概念及类型
醉酒在,在医学上又称作“酒精中毒”,“乙醇中毒”,是指由于一次饮酒所致的人的精神神经系功能障碍。醉酒分为急性和慢性两种类型,其中急性醉酒又包括下面三种类型:
1、生理性醉酒。是因一次大量饮酒而引起的一次性精神兴奋状态。其特征是具有高度不稳定性和激动性,失去自我理性控制,易出现攻击性行为,且行为具有指向性。
2、病理性醉酒。是因原先存在体质异常或病理基础，少量饮酒后急骤发生意识障碍，发作呈暴发攻击性，伴有幻觉，行为无指向性。
3、复杂性醉酒。又称恶性醉酒，是一种有争议的醉酒状态。发作时多有人格障碍。易激惹,并伴有狂暴行为。
二、醉酒人的刑事责任能力
关于醉酒人的责任能力问题,笔者认为不仅要在主观方面加以区分,而且应注意区分不同醉酒程度,只有这样才能正确判定其责任能力。生理性醉酒和程度较轻的复杂性醉酒者具有完全责任能力,严重的复杂性醉酒者为限定责任能力,病理性醉酒者为无责任能力。
三、醉酒人犯罪应当负刑事责任的理论根据
1、醉酒人实施刑法所禁止的行为符合犯罪构成要件。
2、追究醉酒人犯罪的刑事责任,是我国刑事立法维护和强化社会主义道德的需要。
3、追究醉酒人犯罪的刑事责任,是我国刑罚目的的需要。
四、病理性醉酒人犯罪的刑事责任
1、病理性醉酒人在醉态中实施的危害行为不符合主客相统一的犯罪构成。
2、追究病理性醉酒人实施的危害行为的刑事责任达不到我国刑罚的目的。
3、病理性醉酒属于精神病范畴,不应负刑事责任。
五、醉酒人犯罪的主观罪过形式
醉酒人在醉态之中实施的危害行为,有的只能是故意甚至是直接故意的,而有的则一般都是过失性质的。
六、 醉酒人犯罪的刑事责任减免
1、对于生理性醉酒和程度较轻的复杂性醉酒的人犯罪不应减免刑事责任。
2、严重的复杂性醉酒人实施了犯罪行为，应减免其刑事责任。
3、病理醉酒人犯罪应免除其刑事责任。
4、醉酒人犯罪减轻刑事责任的其他情况。
七、醉酒人犯罪承担刑事责任方式
1、要严格区分罪与非罪的界限。
2、要适当区分行为人醉酒的不同心态。
3、对醉酒前就有犯罪故意的应从重处罚。
4、对与职务和职业活动有关的醉酒人犯罪，应从重处罚。

英文文摘  The crime committed by the intoxicated person is not described in details in the criminal law in China. In addition, the actual situation is very complicated. With the development of modern medicine and research on judicature psychosis, the research on criminal responsibility of the intoxicated person becomes more important. This article concerns the following seven aspects: Definition and types of intoxication; the criminal responsibility of the intoxicated person; the theoretical basis put to use in judging the criminal responsibility; the criminal responsibility of the pathological intoxicated person; the subjective criminal forms of the intoxicated person; the mitigation or annulment of the criminal responsibility; and the forms in which the responsibility is born. The purpose is to make the theoretical system of the criminal responsibility perfect.
The article consists of seven parts:
I Definition and types of intoxication
Intoxication is also called alcoholism in medicine. It refers functional disorder in nervous system as a result of once drunk. Intoxication is divided into two types, acute and chronic. Acute intoxication includes the following types:
1. Physiological intoxication. It is an excited state of mind resulting from a once drink. It has the unsteady and excited features, losing reasonable self-control, apt to appear attack, action with direction.
2. Pathological intoxication. It is because the intoxicated person has abnormal physique or pathological disease that after drinking a little he will have consciousness obstacle. When the liquor began to show its effect, he tends to attack others abruptly with vision in his mind, action without direction.
3. Complex Intoxication: It is also called vicious intoxication-a kind of disputable intoxication state. When the liquor began to show its effect, he usually has personality obstacle, easy to stir up trouble with violence.
II. The criminal responsible ability of the intoxicated person.
As to the responsible ability, I think it should be distinguished not only in subjective aspect, but also in various drunken degrees. Only in this way can we judge his responsible ability correctly. Physiological and complex intoxicated person of light degree have full responsible ability, while serious complex ones have definite responsible ability and pathological ones have no responsible ability.
III. The theoretical basis put to use in judging the criminal responsibility of intoxicated person.
1. Several behaviors committed by intoxicated persons are prohibited by criminal law.
2.To investigate and affix the responsibility of intoxicated criminals is the need of the defense of the criminal legislation and the reinforcement of the socialist morality in our country.
3. To investigate and affix the responsibility of intoxicated criminals is the need of the purpose of penalty.
IV. The criminal responsibility of the pathological intoxicated person.
1. The harmful behaviors committed by the pathological intoxicated person who is in drunken state conform to neither subjective nor objective crime.
2. The goal of penalty can''t be attained with investigating and affixing the criminal responsibility of the harmful behaviors committed by the pathological intoxicated person.
3.The pathological intoxication belongs to some kind of mental disease. He shouldn''t be responsible for criminal responsibility
V. The subjective criminal forms of the intoxicated person.
Some of the harmful behaviors submitted by intoxicated person who is in drunken state at the time are on purpose or even on purpose directly while others generally are negligent.
VI. The criminal responsibility''s mitigation of intoxicated person.
1. Physiological drunk and light degree complex intoxicated person should not be mitigated the criminal responsibility.
2. If a serious complex intoxicated person commit a crime, he should be mitigated the criminal responsibility.
3. If a pathological drunk commit a crime, he should be relieve the criminal responsibility.
4. Other situation of intoxicated person lessen criminal responsibility.
VII. The manner of criminal responsibility undertaken by the intoxicated person.
1. To distinguish crime from non-crime strictly.
2. To distinguish the different mind of the intoxicated person.
3. Those who commit a crime on purpose before they are drunk should be punished heavily.
4. The intoxicated person concerned with duties and profession should be punished heavily.

关键词  醉酒人,犯罪,刑事责任,自由词  
分类标识  D924  
论文注解日期  19990315  
总页数  31P